Se afișează postările cu eticheta Vaccine. Afișați toate postările
Se afișează postările cu eticheta Vaccine. Afișați toate postările

marți, 13 decembrie 2011

Vaccine Developed That Attacks Breast Cancer In Mice; Implications For Ovarian, Colorectal And Pancreatic Cancers

Main Category: Breast Cancer
Also Included In: Pancreatic Cancer;  Ovarian Cancer;  Immune System / Vaccines
Article Date: 13 Dec 2011 - 3:00 PST

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  
not yet ratednot yet rated
Researchers from the University of Georgia and the Mayo Clinic in Arizona have developed a vaccine that dramatically reduces tumors in a mouse model that mimics 90 percent of human breast and pancreatic cancer cases - including those that are resistant to common treatments.

The vaccine, described this week in the early edition of the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, reveals a promising new strategy for treating cancers that share the same distinct carbohydrate signature, including ovarian and colorectal cancers.

"This vaccine elicits a very strong immune response," said study co-senior author Geert-Jan Boons, Franklin Professor of Chemistry and a researcher in the UGA Cancer Center and its Complex Carbohydrate Research Center. "It activates all three components of the immune system to reduce tumor size by an average of 80 percent."

When cells become cancerous, the sugars on their surface proteins undergo distinct changes that set them apart from healthy cells. For decades, scientists have tried to enable the immune system to recognize those differences to destroy cancer cells rather than normal cells. But since cancer cells originate within the body, the immune system generally doesn't recognize them as foreign and therefore doesn't mount an attack.

The researchers used unique mice developed by Sandra Gendler, Grohne Professor of Therapeutics for Cancer Research at the Mayo Clinic in Arizona and co-senior author on the study. Like humans, the mice develop tumors that overexpress a protein known as MUC1 on the surface of their cells. The tumor-associated MUC1 protein is adorned with a distinctive, shorter, set of carbohydrates that set it apart from healthy cells.

"This is the first time that a vaccine has been developed that trains the immune system to distinguish and kill cancer cells based on their different sugar structures on proteins such as MUC1," Gendler said. "We are especially excited about the fact that MUC1 was recently recognized by the National Cancer Institute as one of the three most important tumor proteins for vaccine development."

Gendler pointed out that MUC1 is found on more than 70 percent of all cancers that kill. Many cancers, such as breast, pancreatic, ovarian and multiple myeloma, express MUC1 with the shorter carbohydrate in more than 90 percent of cases.

She explained that when cancer occurs, the architecture of the cell changes and MUC1 is produced at high levels, promoting tumor formation. A vaccine directed against MUC1 has tremendous potential, Gendler said, as a preventative for recurrence or as a prophylactic in patients at high risk for particular cancers. A vaccine also can be used together with standard therapy such as chemotherapy in cancers that cannot be cured by surgery, such as pancreatic cancer.

Boons noted that MUC1 is also overexpressed in 90 percent of the subset of patients who are not responsive to hormonal therapy, such as Tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors, or the drug Herceptin. These so-called "triple-negative" tumors are extremely aggressive and difficult to treat, Boons said, and a new treatment option is urgently needed.

"In the U.S. alone, there are 35,000 patients diagnosed every year whose tumors are triple-negative," Boons said. "So we might have a therapy for a large group of patients for which there is currently no drug therapy aside from chemotherapy."

Therapeutic vaccines received renewed attention last year when the Food and Drug Administration approved the first cancer treatment vaccine, a drug known as Provenge that is used to treat metastatic prostate cancer. Treatment with the drug, which is manufactured in Georgia, requires clinicians to isolate immune cells from the patient and then to send the cells to a lab, where they are linked to a protein that stimulates the immune system. The cells are returned to the patient's treating physician, who then infuses the drug over three treatments, usually two weeks apart.

Boons' vaccine, on the other hand, is much simpler. It is fully synthetic, meaning that its components can be manufactured in a lab with assembly-line precision. The vaccine consists of three components - an immune system booster known as an adjuvant, a component that triggers the production of the immune system's T-helper cells, and a carbohydrate-linked peptide molecule that directs the immune response to cells bearing MUC1 proteins with truncated carbohydrates.

Biotechnology is a key industry in Georgia, and this year Boons founded an Athens-based company, known as Viamune, to help develop and commercialize the vaccine and the technologies used to create it. The company is one of nearly 30 that are affiliated with the University's BioBusiness Center, which is an incubator for life sciences start-up companies associated with UGA.

"Companies like these have the potential to create stable, high-paying jobs that have a significant social and economic impact," said Stefan Schulze, associate director of the Georgia BioBusiness Center. He noted that Viamune was a one four finalists selected from 40 companies at an investor's forum hosted this year by the non-profit organization Southeast BIO.

Boons, Gendler and their colleagues are currently testing the vaccine's effectiveness against human cancer cells in culture and are planning to assess its toxicity. If all goes well, they anticipate that phase I clinical trials to test the safety of the vaccine could begin by late 2013.

The vaccine represents nearly a decade of work on the part of Boons and his team. A 2007 study demonstrated the vaccine's effectiveness in another mouse model, and Boons is cautiously optimistic about his most recent results. Although promising results in mice often don't translate to humans, Boons said he is confident that vaccines that target the specific carbohydrate signatures of cancer cells will ultimately play an important role in the treatment of the disease.

"We are beginning to have therapies that can teach our immune system to fight what is uniquely found in cancer cells," Boons said. "When combined with early diagnosis, the hope is that one day cancer will become a manageable disease."

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release. Click 'references' tab above for source.
Visit our breast cancer section for the latest news on this subject. In addition to co-senior authors Boons, Ph.D., and Gendler, Ph.D., the co-first authors on the paper are Vani Lakshminarayanan, Ph.D., at the Mayo Clinic in Arizona and Pamela Thompson at the University of Georgia. Additional authors include, at UGA, Margreet Wolfert, Ph.D., and Therese Buskas, Ph.D., and, at the Mayo Clinic, Judy Bradley, Latha Pathangey, Cathy Madsen and Peter Cohen, M.D.
University of Georgia Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

University of Georgia. "Vaccine Developed That Attacks Breast Cancer In Mice; Implications For Ovarian, Colorectal And Pancreatic Cancers." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 13 Dec. 2011. Web.
13 Dec. 2011. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here

Cancer Vaccine Significantly Reduces Tumor Size

Editor's Choice
Academic Journal
Main Category: Cancer / Oncology
Also Included In: Immune System / Vaccines
Article Date: 13 Dec 2011 - 8:00 PST

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  
5 stars5 stars
An experimental cancer vaccine has been found to reduce tumor size by an average of 80%, researchers from the Mayo Clinic and the University of Georgia reported in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. In their animal experiment, mouse models that mimic most human pancreatic and breast cancer cases had dramatic reductions in tumor size - even among those that had not responded to standard treatments.

Tumors that share the same distinct carbohydrate signature may be especially treatable with this new vaccine, say the authors. This includes various cancers such as colorectal, ovarian, breast, pancreatic and some others.

Co-senior author Geert-Jan Boons, wrote:

"This vaccine elicits a very strong immune response. It activates all three components of the immune system to reduce tumor size by an average of 80 percent."

Sugars on the surface proteins of cancerous cells are different from those in healthy cells, the authors explain. For several years, researchers have sought ways of getting the immune system to identify the differences and target the cancer cells only, leaving the healthy ones alone. However, this is not easy, because cancer cells start off in the patient's own body, and his/her immune system does not see them as foreign or pathogenic, and does not attack them.

Study co-author, Sandra Gendler, developed some unique mice for this experiment. Tumors in mice overexpress MUC1, a type of protein, on the surface of their cells. The surface of MUC1 found in tumors has a unique, shorter set of carbohydrates (this is not the case with carbohydrates on the surface of healthy cells).

Gendler said:

"This is the first time that a vaccine has been developed that trains the immune system to distinguish and kill cancer cells based on their different sugar structures on proteins such as MUC1. We are especially excited about the fact that MUC1 was recently recognized by the National Cancer Institute as one of the three most important tumor proteins for vaccine development."

MUC1 was found to exist in over 70% of all lethal cancer, Gendler explained. In ovarian, pancreatic and breast cancers, as well as multiple myeloma, in 90% of cases MUC1 is expressed with the shorter carbohydrate.

When a cell becomes cancerous, its structure alters and MUC1 is overproduced - this promotes tumor formation. Hence, the potential for a vaccine that targets MUC1, either as a preventative (prophylactic) measure for high risk patients, or to reduce the risk of cancer recurrence. The vaccine could also be extremely helpful in cancer cases where surgery is not possible, such as pancreatic cancer, to be used together with chemotherapy.

Some cancer patients do not respond to hormonal therapy, such as aromatase inhibitors, Tamoxifen, or Herceptin. In 90% of these patients, MUC1 is overexpressed. Tripe-negative tumors are very aggressive and hard to treat.

Boons wrote:

"In the U.S. alone, there are 35,000 patients diagnosed every year whose tumors are triple-negative. So we might have a therapy for a large group of patients for which there is currently no drug therapy aside from chemotherapy."

Boons' vaccine is much simpler than other therapeutic ones, such as Provenge (for prostate cancer), because it is fully synthetic and can be manufactured in a laboratory with assembly-line precision.

The vaccine has three components: An adjuvant (an immune system booster)A component that encourages the production of T-helper cells (part of the immune system)A peptide linked to carbohydrate that makes the immune system target those cells that bear the MUC1 proteinsGendler, Boons and team are carrying out tests to see how effective the vaccine is against human cancer cells in culture. They are also planning to see how toxic (safe) it is. If all goes according to plan, Phase I trials to determine safety could be underway before the end of 2013.

Boons said:

"We are beginning to have therapies that can teach our immune system to fight what is uniquely found in cancer cells. When combined with early diagnosis, the hope is that one day cancer will become a manageable disease."

Written by Christian Nordqvist


Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today Visit our cancer / oncology section for the latest news on this subject. Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

Christian Nordqvist. "Cancer Vaccine Significantly Reduces Tumor Size." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 13 Dec. 2011. Web.
13 Dec. 2011. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


posted by Mark Reddish on 13 Dec 2011 at 8:54 am

Great to see this article that identifies the potential for MUC1 vaccines. To bad it is 15 years after the first articles describing exactly the same thing. This is not a first, it is not even a second, it is after a long line of vaccine candidates long ago published and moved into clinical trials. Sandy knows better, she worked on some of those a long time ago. Shame on the author for not doing proper diligence. Theratope was a vaccine targeting the sugars on MUC1 and Stimuvax is phase III and is peptide core, exactly the same.

| post followup | alert a moderator |



posted by Carlos Rodriguez on 13 Dec 2011 at 10:12 am

I'm wondering if it would be possible for my dog who has a tumor on her lung could be an candidate for this experiment.

| post followup | alert a moderator |


posted by Jim West on 13 Dec 2011 at 10:15 am

If a cancer patient was willing to take all risks and asked for no guarantees, could he/she try the Boons vaccine?

| post followup | alert a moderator |


posted by Esther on 13 Dec 2011 at 10:34 am

There have been many successful treatments for cancer over the past 100 years..but the PHARMA industry will not allow these to be distributed widely because of the billion dollar industry cancer is. What would happen to oncologist, radiologists, etc. if a vaccine was found? The Susan Komen organization and the American Cancer Society would be out of business.
I pray this vaccine will be distributed soon..so many people have died in this holocaust!!

| post followup | alert a moderator |


Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here

duminică, 11 decembrie 2011

Promising Results In Mice On Needle-Free Candidate Universal Vaccine Against Various Flu Viruses

Main Category: Flu / Cold / SARS
Also Included In: Immune System / Vaccines;  Swine Flu
Article Date: 10 Dec 2011 - 0:00 PST

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  
not yet ratednot yet rated
Scientists from the International Vaccine Institute (IVI) have discovered that an antigen common to most influenza viruses, and commonly referred to as matrix protein 2 (M2), when administered under the tongue could protect mice against experimental infection caused by various influenza viruses, including the highly pathogenic avian H5 virus and the pandemic H1 ("swine flu") virus.

Importantly, this experimental sublingual vaccine was found to induce immunity in the lungs whereas the same vaccine administered by injection failed to do so and conferred only limited protection against experimental infection. The study, spearheaded by IVI scientist Dr. Man-ki Song and Dr. Haryoung Poo from the Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB), was reported in the November 30th issue of the journal PLoS ONE (read the report).

Current seasonal influenza vaccines are designed to induce immunity against hemagglutinin (HA), a major component of influenza virus. Because HA undergoes frequent mutations, these vaccines have to be reformulated and manufactured every year to incorporate newly emerging influenza virus strains selected by the World Health Organization.

Due to the recent emergence of highly pathogenic influenza virus strains and the threat of a human flu pandemic, health authorities and vaccine producers are under increasing pressure to manufacture and deliver a sufficient number of vaccine doses in a short time, amid a limited global production capacity.

The influenza virus M2 has already been considered as a rational target antigen for development of a universal flu vaccine because this protein is highly conserved among the different types of influenza viruses. However, attempts to develop M2-based vaccines administered by injection have been unsuccessful.

"Sublingual vaccination with M2 induced immune responses in the lungs of mice whereas the same vaccine administered by injection failed to do so. This is probably why earlier attempts involving injection of M2-based vaccines failed to protect against influenza infection and disease," said Dr. Man-ki Song, IVI scientist and lead author of the study. "This vaccination approach offers an additional strategy to prevent influenza infection and may be used to control potential influenza pandemics."

Plans to test this vaccination approach in humans are being considered. "This study suggests that aside from being a more convenient way to immunize people, sublingual vaccination induces special immune responses in the respiratory tract which are important in protection but more difficult to generate with traditional injectable vaccines. Clearly, if these promising findings obtained in laboratory animals can be reproduced in humans, they will represent a major milestone in the IVI R&D agenda." said Dr. Cecil Czerkinsky, IVI Deputy Director-General for Laboratory Sciences.

The study was supported by the National Agenda Project of the Korea Research Council of Fundamental Science and Technology. Dr Christian Loucq, IVI Director-General, said, "Since pandemic influenza remains a global threat and would most likely start in the Asia-Pacific region, this study underscores IVI and the Republic of Korea's commitments to join global efforts to build preparedness for and response to pandemic influenza."

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release. Click 'references' tab above for source.
Visit our flu / cold / sars section for the latest news on this subject. Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

International Vaccine Institute. "Promising Results In Mice On Needle-Free Candidate Universal Vaccine Against Various Flu Viruses." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 10 Dec. 2011. Web.
11 Dec. 2011. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here

vineri, 9 decembrie 2011

Norovirus VLP Vaccine Is First Ever To Demonstrate Significant Protection Against Acute Norovirus Gastroenteritis In Phase I/II Study

Both Pregnant Women And Newborns Protected By The H1N1 Flu Vaccine

Main Category: Swine Flu
Also Included In: Immune System / Vaccines;  Pregnancy / Obstetrics;  Pediatrics / Children's Health
Article Date: 09 Dec 2011 - 1:00 PST

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  
not yet ratednot yet rated
The researchers studied the immune response of 107 pregnant women after they were injected with a single dose of non-adjuvant H1N1 vaccine. They concluded that the influenza shot boosted the immune response in pregnant women and at the same time protected neuronatal babies via the antibodies that transferred through the placenta.

These results were published in the review Annals of Internal Medicine.*

Influenza (the flu) is a contagious, acute respiratory infection caused by the family of viruses Influenzae. There are three types of Influenza virus: A, B and C. The A and B viruses cause seasonal (or winter) epidemics, but only the A virus is responsible for worldwide epidemics. Very soon into the worldwide influenza epidemic of 2009, pregnant women and neonatal babies were found to be at very high risk of complications and death if infected, as had already been observed during previous worldwide influenza epidemics. As early as August 2009, a study published in The Lancet showed that 10% of the serious cases were observed in pregnant women, whereas they represented only 1% of the total French population. So H1N1 influenza vaccination of pregnant women was recommended as a priority.

The team led by Odile Launey, the Director of vaccinology at the Centre for Clinical Investigation at Cochin Pasteur (Inserm/AP-HP/Institut Pasteur/Université Paris Descartes), carried out a vaccination study in order to demonstrate the immunogenicity, in other words the immune response in terms of the production of antibodies, after a single injection of a nonadjuvant A strain (H1N1) into women at 21 days and 42 days of gestation and to measure the transplacentary transfer of the mother's antibodies to neonatal babies.

This study concerned 107 women between 22 and 32 weeks of amenorrhea who were monitored in 5 French neonatal clinics between November 3rd and December 4th 2009 after being injected into the arm with an injection of H1N1 A strain vaccine.

Blood tests were carried out in order to measure the antibody counts protecting against the influenza virus: Prior to vaccination 3 and 6 weeks after vaccination At delivery 3 months after delivery On delivery, a blood sample is taken from the umbilical cord in order to measure the quantity of influenza antibodies transmitted to the newly born. All events observed in mothers and babies during the study were recorded.

Prior to vaccination, 19% of the patients already presented H1N1 strain antibodies at levels considered to be protective. Three and six weeks after vaccination, 98% of the patients presented blood antibody counts considered to be protective. On delivery and 3 weeks after delivery, the proportion of patients with antibody counts considered to be protective were between 92% and 90%. The umbilical cord samples of newly born babies showed antibody counts considered to be protective in 95% of cases, some antibody concentrations were even higher than in the mothers (a ratio of 1.4 between neonatal babies concentrations and maternal concentrations at delivery).

"These results show that the influenza vaccine boosts the immune system in pregnant women and also protects newly-borns via transplacenta transfer ", concludes Odile Launay.

This study and an increasing number of other studies on pregnant women have confirmed the non-toxicity of the influenza vaccine during pregnancy. This year again, pregnant women are strongly recommended to take the influenza vaccine. The composition of the vaccine is modified each year to cover the major strains of the previous winter, which are the strains most likely to be present the next winter. "The H1N1 2009 virus is still around. That's why the inactivated H1N1 virus is still present in the current seasonal influenza vaccine". So it is highly recommended to vaccinate pregnant women in order to protect them and their baby, because otherwise the vaccine cannot be administered to babies before the age of 6 months", explains Odile Launay.

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release. Click 'references' tab above for source.
Visit our swine flu section for the latest news on this subject. *Results published in the review Annals of Internal Medicine dated December 6th,.2011. They are available on-line at: http://www.annals.org/content/155/11/733.abstract
INSERM (Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale) Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

INSERM (Institut national de la santé et de la re. "Both Pregnant Women And Newborns Protected By The H1N1 Flu Vaccine." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 9 Dec. 2011. Web.
9 Dec. 2011. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here

Malaria Transmission-blocking Vaccine Assessment

Editor's Choice
Main Category: Tropical Diseases
Also Included In: Immune System / Vaccines
Article Date: 09 Dec 2011 - 11:00 PST

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  
not yet ratednot yet rated
At a presentation during the 60th annual meeting of the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, three leaders in malaria vaccine development announced their collaboration of assessing a potential vaccine candidate designed to prevent transmission of malaria from mosquitoes to humans. Researchers believe that the type of vaccine could contribute to the eventual eradication of malaria.

The partners - the PATH Malaria Vaccine Initiative (MVI), the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Center for Immunization Research (CIR) - will collaborate on conducting a Phase 1 clinical trial in healthy adults to assess the safety and immunogenicity of the protein Pfs25 in a conjugated vaccine developed at NIAID.

Malaria claims almost 800,000 lives each year, with most of the victims being African children younger than 5 years. The battle against the disease has been challenging, as both the parasite and the mosquito host are highly adaptive and have survived for thousands of years. Even though drugs and insecticides have had a substantial effect on the burden of disease, the resistance of the parasite and mosquito continues to pose an ongoing threat.

The TBV Pfs25 approach aims to block malaria from being transmitted from mosquitoes to humans by preventing the malaria parasite from developing in the mosquito, and although such a vaccine would not directly protect an immunized individual from developing clinical malaria, it would reduce the chances that others in the community contract malaria by preventing the spread of infection by the mosquito.

A transmission-blocking vaccine (TBV) would work in combination with drugs and insecticides by blocking the transmission of the parasite. This would decrease the demand on other measures, therefore slowing the development of resistance and subsequently extend their effectiveness.
v Ashley Birkett, PhD, director of research and development at MVI, said:

"This is the first clinical trial supported by MVI to use a transmission-blocking approach. This is the first step in what is typically a long process of evaluation. Nonetheless, we are excited by the potential of TBVs to significantly limit the spread of malaria infection. Eradication of malaria may be decades away, but we believe a successful TBV - used alongside safe and effective drugs, insecticides, bed nets, and possibly a malaria vaccine that protects the individual against infection and disease - would be essential to achieving that goal."

Kawsar Talaat, MD, clinical principal investigator and assistant scientist at the Bloomberg School added:

"The Pfs25 vaccine and other transmission blocking vaccines are unique in their approach in that they target a key stage of the malaria parasite's lifecycle rather than attempting to build immunity to malaria in humans. We'll need many tools to defeat malaria and an effective transmission-blocking vaccine could go a long way toward achieving that goal."

Petra Rattue
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today

Visit our tropical diseases section for the latest news on this subject. Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

Petra Rattue. "Malaria Transmission-blocking Vaccine Assessment." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 9 Dec. 2011. Web.
9 Dec. 2011. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here