Se afișează postările cu eticheta Reduces. Afișați toate postările
Se afișează postările cu eticheta Reduces. Afișați toate postările

joi, 15 decembrie 2011

Vaginal Progesterone Reduces Preterm Birth, Neonatal Morbidity And Mortality In Women At Risk

Main Category: Pregnancy / Obstetrics
Also Included In: Menopause;  Women's Health / Gynecology
Article Date: 15 Dec 2011 - 2:00 PST

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  
not yet ratednot yet rated
Women with a short cervix should be treated with vaginal progesterone to prevent preterm birth, according to a landmark study by leading obstetricians around the world. Vaginal progesterone decreased the rate of preterm birth by 42%, and significantly reduced the rate of respiratory distress syndrome and the need for mechanical ventilation, as well as a composite of several complications of premature newborns (e.g. infection, necrotizing enterocolitis, intracranial hemorrhage, etc.). An early online version of the study was published today in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG), and is available on the AJOG website free of charge.

"Our analysis provides compelling evidence that vaginal progesterone prevents preterm birth and reduces neonatal morbidity/mortality in women with a short cervix," said lead investigator Dr. Roberto Romero, Chief of the Perinatology Research Branch and Head of the Program in Perinatal Research and Obstetrics of the Division of Intramural Research for the NICHD/NIH/DHHS, Bethesda, MD and Detroit, MI. "Importantly, progesterone reduced early preterm birth (those occurring before 33 or 28 weeks of gestation). These immature babies are at the greatest risk for complications, death, and long-term disability (e.g. cerebral palsy). Progesterone also decreased a fraction of 'late preterm births,' which are the most common preterm deliveries. The profile of adverse events was no different from placebo.

Follow-up studies of babies exposed to progesterone in utero to the age of 18 or 24 months showed no evidence of any behavioral or physical problems. The authors of this study recommend that transvaginal sonographic measurement of the cervix be performed in all pregnant women between 19 to 24 weeks of gestation to assess the risk of preterm delivery. This strategy also allows the identification of women at risk for preterm delivery during their first pregnancy. Other strategies, which are based on treating women with a previous preterm birth, do not address the challenge of prevention in women with their first pregnancy."

Preterm birth is the leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Moreover, preterm birth is also the main cause of infant mortality (death to the age of one year). Approximately 12.9 million births worldwide are preterm, of which 92.3% occur in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Caribbean. In the United States and Europe, there are 1,000,000 preterm births per year.

Progesterone is a natural hormone produced by the ovary during the menstrual cycle and in early pregnancy, and subsequently, in the placenta. A decline in progesterone action is considered to be important for the onset of labor. If such a decline occurs in the mid-trimester, cervical shortening may lead to the onset of preterm labor. The administration of progesterone is postulated to work by maintaining a high concentration of the hormone in the uterine cervix.

Several studies had evaluated the administration of vaginal progesterone versus placebo to prevent preterm birth when a short cervix was found by ultrasound in the mid-trimester of pregnancy. What is unique about the study published today is that investigators worldwide pooled the data from the different studies and performed a meta-analysis of individual patient data (IPD). This is the "gold standard" for summarizing evidence across clinical trials. It has the advantage of increasing the power to detect differences in efficacy and adverse events, and also allows subgroup analyses that may not have been possible in each individual study.

The IPD meta-analysis included five high-quality trials of vaginal progesterone versus placebo, was conducted at multiple centers in both developed and developing countries, and included a total of 775 women and 927 infants. The primary endpoints were: 1) preterm birth at <33 weeks; and 2) a composite index of perinatal morbidity and mortality. The authors also studied other secondary endpoints and explored the effect of cervical length, a history of previous preterm birth, maternal age, race/ethnicity, and body mass index on progesterone action.

The results were remarkably consistent and significant across trials performed in different parts of the world. Administering vaginal progesterone to asymptomatic women with a short cervix revealed by sonogram in the mid-trimester was associated with a 42% reduction in the rate of preterm birth before 33 weeks of gestation. There was also a significant reduction in the risk of preterm birth before 35, 34, and 28 weeks.

The study also found a 43% decrease in neonatal morbidity and mortality. Vaginal progesterone significantly reduced the risk of respiratory distress syndrome by 52%, and there was significantly lower admission to NICUs (placebo, 20.7% vs. progesterone, 29.1%).

Results of previous trials about the effects of vaginal progesterone or injectable progestins (synthetic compounds with progesterone action) in women with a twin gestation had been negative. However, a subset of patients in the study published today focused on women with a twin gestation and a short cervix. In this particular group, vaginal progesterone reduced the rate of preterm birth at <33 weeks by 30% and significantly reduced the composite neonatal morbidity/mortality of twins. Dr. Romero indicated that a study of vaginal progesterone in twin pregnancies with a short cervix is urgently needed to confirm these findings because the reduction in preterm birth did not reach significance (most likely due to the small number of twins available to study).

A major finding of this study is that progesterone benefits not only women who have a short cervix, but also those who have a prior preterm birth and a short cervix. This has practical implications, because vaginal progesterone is a less expensive and less invasive alternative than the placement of a cervical suture (cerclage) in patients who had a previous preterm birth and have a short cervix.

"The results of this analysis of five large randomized trials have the potential to result in a sea change in obstetrical practice in the U.S. and Europe and eventually in the rest of the world," commented AJOG Co-Editor-in-Chief, Thomas J. Garite, MD. "Prematurity is the leading cause of death and damage for newly born babies and despite enormous efforts, no impact has been made in the rate of preterm birth, which is actually rising in recent years."

As advocated in an accompanying editorial by C. Andrew Combs, MD, PhD, Obstetrix Medical Group, San Jose, CA, in the print version of the Journal, the potential for reducing prematurity lies in implementing routine vaginal ultrasound for all pregnant women in the middle months of pregnancy to measure the length of the cervix and if a short cervix is found, treat these patients with progesterone. The majority of premature births occur in women with no risk factors, so this approach has real potential to make an impact in the overall premature birth rate. Two recently published cost analysis studies, suggest that this approach can not only save lives and prevent the devastating damages often caused by prematurity, but can also result in a annual savings of nearly 1/2 billion dollars in health care costs in the U.S. alone.

Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release. Source: Elsevier
Visit our pregnancy / obstetrics section for the latest news on this subject. Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

Elsevier. "Vaginal Progesterone Reduces Preterm Birth, Neonatal Morbidity And Mortality In Women At Risk." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 15 Dec. 2011. Web.
15 Dec. 2011. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here

Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Reduces Rate Of Complications Following Deep Vein Thrombosis

Editor's Choice
Academic Journal
Main Category: Vascular
Article Date: 14 Dec 2011 - 9:00 PST

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  
not yet ratednot yet rated
A study presented at the American Society of Hematology Meeting in San Diego, USA by professor Per Morten Sandset at the Department of Hematology at Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet in Oslo, Norway and his team has shown that deep vein thrombosis (DVT) leads to the development of complications (post-thrombotic syndrome) in nearly half of DVT patients. The study, published Online First in The Lancet demonstrates that the rate of these complications can be reduced by about a quarter through a catheter-directed additional thrombolysis.

1 in 1,000 person per population per year will experience an acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the lower limbs that is linked to significant risk of morbidity and mortality. Many patients develop a venous dysfunction that results in post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) despite receiving anticoagulation treatments that effectively prevents thrombus extension, recurrence, pulmonary embolism and death. The characteristics of PTS are swelling, pain, a sensation of heaviness, pigmentation, oedema and skin deterioration of the affected limb, as well as venous ulcers in severe cases.

Researchers conducted a randomized, controlled trial on 209 patients between the ages of 18 to 75 years, who had a first-time iliofemoral DVT within 21 days from symptom onset. They randomly assigned 108 patients to receive conventional treatment alone, whilst 101 patients received conventional treatment with additional CDT. The primary outcome was frequency of PTS with researchers examining patients using a validated and recommended scoring system, known as the Villalta score, at 24-months. In addition they also checked patients for the presence of open vessels after 6 months, allowing the limb to function (iliofemoral patency).

After completion of the 24-months follow up, data for clinical status were available for 90% or 189 patients, i.e. for 99 patients in the conventional treatment alone group and 90 patients in the conventional treatment plus CDT group. The researchers discovered at 24 months that 37 or 41% of patients in the additional CDT group had developed PTS compared with 55 patients or 56% in the control group. This means that one case of PTS was avoided in every seven cases of those treated with catheter-directed alteplase. 58 of patients (66%) in the additional CDT group reported iliofemoral patency after 6 months of treatment compared with 45 patients or 47% in the control group. The researchers reported 20 complications through bleeding linked to CDT, which included three major and five clinically significant bleedings.

The researchers explain and conclude:

"Additional thrombolytic treatment reduced post-thrombotic syndrome compared with anticoagulation alone, but was associated with a small additional risk of bleeding. By contrast with systemic thrombolytic treatment, this bleeding risk seems acceptable, and the effect size was in line with results for systemic treatment.

Our findings support recent guidelines and catheter-directed thrombolysis should be considered in patients with high proximal deep vein thrombosis and low risk of bleeding. Our findings are promising and supplement the scarce and weak documentation on prevention of PTS. We believe that our result is an important contribution to the evidence base for treatment of severe DVT and should be taken into account when clinical guidelines are revised."

Dr Lawrence 'Rusty' Hofmann and Dr William T Kuo from the Division of Interventional Radiology at Stanford University School of Medicine in California, USA, write in a linked comment:

"We congratulate Sandset and colleagues for a tremendous contribution to the published literature on DVT. Their pivotal trial data will help to preserve limb function in many patients with DVT by reducing the risk of incurable and debilitating post-thrombotic syndrome. Their trial thereby serves as a powerful motivation to undertake CDT for symptomatic acute lower extremity DVT."

Written by Petra Rattue
Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today

Visit our vascular section for the latest news on this subject. Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

Petra Rattue. "Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Reduces Rate Of Complications Following Deep Vein Thrombosis." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 14 Dec. 2011. Web.
15 Dec. 2011. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here

marți, 13 decembrie 2011

Cancer Vaccine Significantly Reduces Tumor Size

Editor's Choice
Academic Journal
Main Category: Cancer / Oncology
Also Included In: Immune System / Vaccines
Article Date: 13 Dec 2011 - 8:00 PST

email icon email to a friend   printer icon printer friendly   write icon opinions  
5 stars5 stars
An experimental cancer vaccine has been found to reduce tumor size by an average of 80%, researchers from the Mayo Clinic and the University of Georgia reported in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. In their animal experiment, mouse models that mimic most human pancreatic and breast cancer cases had dramatic reductions in tumor size - even among those that had not responded to standard treatments.

Tumors that share the same distinct carbohydrate signature may be especially treatable with this new vaccine, say the authors. This includes various cancers such as colorectal, ovarian, breast, pancreatic and some others.

Co-senior author Geert-Jan Boons, wrote:

"This vaccine elicits a very strong immune response. It activates all three components of the immune system to reduce tumor size by an average of 80 percent."

Sugars on the surface proteins of cancerous cells are different from those in healthy cells, the authors explain. For several years, researchers have sought ways of getting the immune system to identify the differences and target the cancer cells only, leaving the healthy ones alone. However, this is not easy, because cancer cells start off in the patient's own body, and his/her immune system does not see them as foreign or pathogenic, and does not attack them.

Study co-author, Sandra Gendler, developed some unique mice for this experiment. Tumors in mice overexpress MUC1, a type of protein, on the surface of their cells. The surface of MUC1 found in tumors has a unique, shorter set of carbohydrates (this is not the case with carbohydrates on the surface of healthy cells).

Gendler said:

"This is the first time that a vaccine has been developed that trains the immune system to distinguish and kill cancer cells based on their different sugar structures on proteins such as MUC1. We are especially excited about the fact that MUC1 was recently recognized by the National Cancer Institute as one of the three most important tumor proteins for vaccine development."

MUC1 was found to exist in over 70% of all lethal cancer, Gendler explained. In ovarian, pancreatic and breast cancers, as well as multiple myeloma, in 90% of cases MUC1 is expressed with the shorter carbohydrate.

When a cell becomes cancerous, its structure alters and MUC1 is overproduced - this promotes tumor formation. Hence, the potential for a vaccine that targets MUC1, either as a preventative (prophylactic) measure for high risk patients, or to reduce the risk of cancer recurrence. The vaccine could also be extremely helpful in cancer cases where surgery is not possible, such as pancreatic cancer, to be used together with chemotherapy.

Some cancer patients do not respond to hormonal therapy, such as aromatase inhibitors, Tamoxifen, or Herceptin. In 90% of these patients, MUC1 is overexpressed. Tripe-negative tumors are very aggressive and hard to treat.

Boons wrote:

"In the U.S. alone, there are 35,000 patients diagnosed every year whose tumors are triple-negative. So we might have a therapy for a large group of patients for which there is currently no drug therapy aside from chemotherapy."

Boons' vaccine is much simpler than other therapeutic ones, such as Provenge (for prostate cancer), because it is fully synthetic and can be manufactured in a laboratory with assembly-line precision.

The vaccine has three components: An adjuvant (an immune system booster)A component that encourages the production of T-helper cells (part of the immune system)A peptide linked to carbohydrate that makes the immune system target those cells that bear the MUC1 proteinsGendler, Boons and team are carrying out tests to see how effective the vaccine is against human cancer cells in culture. They are also planning to see how toxic (safe) it is. If all goes according to plan, Phase I trials to determine safety could be underway before the end of 2013.

Boons said:

"We are beginning to have therapies that can teach our immune system to fight what is uniquely found in cancer cells. When combined with early diagnosis, the hope is that one day cancer will become a manageable disease."

Written by Christian Nordqvist


Copyright: Medical News Today
Not to be reproduced without permission of Medical News Today Visit our cancer / oncology section for the latest news on this subject. Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

MLA

Christian Nordqvist. "Cancer Vaccine Significantly Reduces Tumor Size." Medical News Today. MediLexicon, Intl., 13 Dec. 2011. Web.
13 Dec. 2011. APA

Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.


posted by Mark Reddish on 13 Dec 2011 at 8:54 am

Great to see this article that identifies the potential for MUC1 vaccines. To bad it is 15 years after the first articles describing exactly the same thing. This is not a first, it is not even a second, it is after a long line of vaccine candidates long ago published and moved into clinical trials. Sandy knows better, she worked on some of those a long time ago. Shame on the author for not doing proper diligence. Theratope was a vaccine targeting the sugars on MUC1 and Stimuvax is phase III and is peptide core, exactly the same.

| post followup | alert a moderator |



posted by Carlos Rodriguez on 13 Dec 2011 at 10:12 am

I'm wondering if it would be possible for my dog who has a tumor on her lung could be an candidate for this experiment.

| post followup | alert a moderator |


posted by Jim West on 13 Dec 2011 at 10:15 am

If a cancer patient was willing to take all risks and asked for no guarantees, could he/she try the Boons vaccine?

| post followup | alert a moderator |


posted by Esther on 13 Dec 2011 at 10:34 am

There have been many successful treatments for cancer over the past 100 years..but the PHARMA industry will not allow these to be distributed widely because of the billion dollar industry cancer is. What would happen to oncologist, radiologists, etc. if a vaccine was found? The Susan Komen organization and the American Cancer Society would be out of business.
I pray this vaccine will be distributed soon..so many people have died in this holocaust!!

| post followup | alert a moderator |


Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.

If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.

All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)

Contact Our News Editors

For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.

Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:

Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.



View the original article here