Article Date: 09 Dec 2011 - 0:00 PST
email to a friend 
printer friendly 
opinions 
Post-menopausal women with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer may have a new treatment option that could lengthen their lives, according to results of a study by the SWOG clinical trials network that were presented at the 2011 CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.
The combination of the two anti-estrogen drugs anastrozole and fulvestrant used in the SWOG S0226 trial extended the median survival time of women with breast cancer by more than six months compared to those who underwent standard treatment with anastrozole alone (47.7 months vs 41.3 months). The combination therapy also lengthened the median time to disease progression (15 months vs 13.5 months).
Lead study coordinator Rita Mehta, M.D., of the University of California, Irvine Medical Center says the results of the phase III trial are particularly exciting because "these patients have not had a new treatment that gave them an overall survival benefit in more than a decade."
Anastrozole (Arimidex®) and fulvestrant (Faslodex®) are both already used in treating breast cancer, though not in combination. The former reduces the production of tumor-promoting estrogen, while the latter interferes with the receptors that allow estrogen to signal cells to grow and reproduce.
Researchers think it's these two different modes of action together that make the combination so effective against hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, the subtype that accounts for more than half of all breast cancers.
"If we take away estrogen and the estrogen receptor, the two together should be better than just doing one at a time," says Mehta.
Starting in the spring of 2004, she and colleagues at 72 other institutions enrolled 707 postmenopausal women with metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer to the trial.
Women were assigned at random to one of the study's two arms. Patients on both arms got a standard 1 mg oral daily dose of anastrozole. Those on the combination arm also got a 250 mg injection of fulvestrant every 28 days, after an initial set of injections to raise the level of fulvestrant in their bloodstream. Researchers saw no significant differences in how well patients tolerated the two therapies.
The overall survival benefit was particularly strong in women who had not previously had tamoxifen therapy for their breast cancer. Among this tamoxifen-naive group (about 60 percent of patients in each arm), median overall survival time on the combination therapy was 47.7 months as compared to 39.7 months for those taking only anastrozole.
The trial researchers are hesitant, however, to focus too much attention on this aspect of the findings. Because plans to analyze the results by prior tamoxifen use were not built into the original trial design, the results of that analysis must clear a higher bar to be found statistically significant.
"We need to better understand other possible factors, since the prior tamoxifen factor could be a false lead from an unplanned analysis," says Mehta, who is eager to see whether even more patients might benefit from this combination treatment.
"The next step for researchers," she says, "would be to try the combination in even earlier stages of breast cancer to test whether long-term cures could be increased at those stages."
Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release. Click 'references' tab above for source.Visit our breast cancer section for the latest news on this subject. Funding for the trial came primarily from the National Cancer Institute, one of the National Institutes of Health. Additional support, and the anastrozole and fulvestrant for the trial, were provided by AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, of Wilmington, Del.
Abstract reference:
Mehta RS, Barlow WE, Albain KS, et al. "A Phase III randomized trial of anastrozole versus anastrozole and fulvestrant as first-line therapy for postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer: SWOG S0226." Presented at the 2011 CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 6 - 10, 2011 (presentation S1-1).
Other authors on the abstract include WE Barlow and DL Lew of the SWOG Statistical Center, KS Albain of Loyola University, TA Vandenberg of London Regional Cancer Centre/NCIC-CTG, SR Dakhil of Wichita CCOP, NR Tirumali of Northwest CCOP, DF Hayes of University of Michigan, JR Gralow of Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, RB Livingston of University of Arizona, and GN Hortobagyi of MD Anderson.
University of Michigan Health System Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:
MLA
9 Dec. 2011.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.
