Article Date: 15 Dec 2011 - 0:00 PST
email to a friend 
printer friendly 
opinions 
Self-epilation is an acceptable alternative to surgery in patients with mild trachomatous trichiasis
Teaching patients with mild trachomatous trichiasis - a leading cause of blindness in low resource countries in which chronic conjunctivitis leads to scarring causing the eyelids to turn inwards and the eye lashes to rub the eye causing pain, corneal damage, and visual impairment - to safely pull out the eyelashes touching their eye (epilation) using clean forceps, is an acceptable alternative to surgery to preserving vision. Furthermore, epilation may have additional advantages as surgical services are likely to remain unacceptable, inaccessible or prohibitively expensive for many people with the condition.
These findings from a large trial involving 1300 people in Ethiopia (the country with the highest rates of trachoma in the world) and published in this week's PLoS Medicine, leave the authors, led by Matthew Burton from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, to conclude that although surgery should be performed for trachomatous trichiasis whenever possible, epilation should be considered when surgery is not available or is declined by the patient: in reality, a large majority of the approximately 8 million people who have trachomatous trichiasis are not receiving surgical treatment and given the enormous backlog of untreated cases, surgery is unlikely to be available to very large numbers of people living with trichiasis for at least the medium term.
The authors say "Where surgery is available and patients are willing to accept it, surgery should be performed, as the disease tends to progress, albeit quite slowly. However, we suggest that for individuals with minor trichiasis (who represent about half of all those with trachomatous trichiasis) epilation should be considered where surgery is either not available or declined by the patient."
In another study published in this week's PLoS Medicine, the same authors found that if surgery for trichiasis is performed, using absorbable sutures is as effective as silk sutures but has the added advantage of eliminating the need for patients to return to the clinic (often having to travel great distances) soon after their operation to have their sutures removed. The authors therefore suggest that trachoma control programs should now consider the potential logistical advantages of using absorbable sutures rather than silk sutures during trichiasis surgery despite the lack of any apparent clinical difference between the two suture types.
The authors say: "The logistical advantages of using absorbable sutures should be taken into consideration when considering the choice of suture material."
Article adapted by Medical News Today from original press release. Click 'references' tab above for source.Visit our eye health / blindness section for the latest news on this subject. Surgery Versus Epilation for the Treatment of Minor Trichiasis in Ethiopia: A Randomised Controlled Noninferiority Trial
Funding: This study was funded by grants from the Band Aid Foundation (via Fight For Sight) and The Wellcome Trust (080741/Z/06/Z). Johnson & Johnson donated all sutures. Tweezerman donated all forceps. Tweezerman made a donation towards the production costs of a trichiasis surgery training DVD. No funding bodies had any role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing Interests: PTK is a member of the Scientific Advisory Boards for Alcon and Bausch & Lomb. All other authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Citation: Rajak SN, Habtamu E, Weiss HA, Kello AB, Gebre T, et al. (2011) Surgery Versus Epilation for the Treatment of Minor Trichiasis in Ethiopia: A Randomised Controlled Noninferiority Trial. PLoS Med 8(12): e1001136. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001136
Absorbable Versus Silk Sutures for Surgical Treatment of Trachomatous Trichiasis in Ethiopia: A Randomised Controlled Trial
Funding: This study was funded by grants from the Band Aid Foundation (via Fight For Sight) and The Wellcome Trust (080741/Z/06/Z). All the sutures (silk and polyglactin-910) were donated by the manufacturer, Ethicon, Johnson & Johnson. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing Interests: PTK is a member of the Scientific Advisory Boards for Alcon and Bausch & Lomb. All other authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Public Library of Science Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:
MLA
15 Dec. 2011.
Please note: If no author information is provided, the source is cited instead.
Please note that we publish your name, but we do not publish your email address. It is only used to let you know when your message is published. We do not use it for any other purpose. Please see our privacy policy for more information.
If you write about specific medications or operations, please do not name health care professionals by name.
All opinions are moderated before being included (to stop spam)
Contact Our News Editors
For any corrections of factual information, or to contact the editors please use our feedback form.
Please send any medical news or health news press releases to:
Note: Any medical information published on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice and you should not take any action before consulting with a health care professional. For more information, please read our terms and conditions.
